Support CAUSA Today!

Showing posts with label racial profiling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racial profiling. Show all posts

Thursday, May 10, 2012

DOJ Again Tells Arpaio They’re Suing Over Civil Rights Violations

H/T to Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM) for posting this article:

DOJ Again Tells Arpaio They’re Suing Over Civil Rights Violations

The Justice Department says they’re putting Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio on final notice.

Over 100 days after first issuing a report which found Arpaio’s Maricopa Country Sheriff’s Office to be in violation of civil rights laws, DOJ has sent a letter telling Arpaio that they have concluded that an agreement “cannot be secured through voluntary means.” DOJ is required under the law to notify a party before they sue them in court.

DOJ said in a letter to Arpaio last month that they didn’t believe the issue could be settled through negotiations.

This was originally published by Talking Points Memo.



Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Thousands Call For Supreme Court to Strike Down Anti-Immigrant Arizona Law to Show They Care for Human Rights

This release comes from the Fair Immigration Reform Movement (FIRM).  The Fair Immigration Reform Movement is a national coalition of grassroots organizations fighting for immigrant rights at the local, state and federal level. Causa Oregon is a part of FIRM Coalition.

Thousands Call For Supreme Court to Strike Down Anti-Immigrant Arizona Law to Show They Care for Human Rights

Broad Coalition of Groups Calls for Unity and Justice for All

(WASHINGTON)—Thousands of grassroots leaders today called on the Supreme Court to strike down Arizona’s anti-immigrant law to show they care for human rights, unity and justice for all.

Arizona’s SB 1070, infamously referred to as the “show me your papers” law, and similar laws enacted in other states, has undermined basic civil and human rights and essentially has legalized harassment and discrimination, said leaders of the Fair Immigration Reform Movement, a network of community-based immigrant advocacy organizations in 25 states.

“SB 1070 takes a sledgehammer to human rights, destroying what America has always been known for: a nation that prides itself on justice for all,” said Deepak Bhargava, Executive Director of the Center for Community Change. “Under SB 1070, there is only justice for people with the right skin color.”

“Arizona’s proposed solution to our broken immigration system, like Alabama’s law and the anti-immigrant laws passed by several other states, is no solution at all. America’s immigrants are our neighbors, our co-workers and our future,” said John Wilhelm, President of UNITE Here. “Criminalization and unfair targeting of our immigrant brothers and sisters is nothing more than scapegoating aimed at dividing us and distracting our attention from the real problems we face – a lack of good jobs and the capture of our political system by the rich and powerful.”

Warren Stewart, senior pastor of the First Institutional Baptist Church in Phoenix, Ariz., was among the Arizonans who traveled to Washington to protest outside the Supreme Court. Stewart is also chairman of the board of directors for the National Immigration Forum, and a board member of Promise Arizona. Stewart noted that former Arizona Senate President Russell Pearce spoke at a counter rally at the Supreme Court this morning, and reminded participants that Pearce, author of SB1070, was removed from office by recall because of his extremism on immigration and other issues important to Arizonans, and emphasized the growing power of a new civil rights movement in America.

Alabama Democratic State Senator Hank Sanders described that the Alabama legislature is poised to make several changes to its own copycat of the Arizona immigration law. He has called on his own legislature to repeal Alabama’s law, which has become a potent reminder of Alabama’s racial history. Sanders also said he has been inspired by the coming together of African America, Latino, immigrant and other communities demanding an end to Arizona-style laws.

Gustavo Torres, Executive Director of CASA de Maryland, emphasized the sense of unity among participants:

“We are united--Latinos, immigrants, civil rights organizations, African American leaders, Asian American leaders, organized labor and faith leaders--in calling for unity and justice in America. One good thing that SB1070 and other laws that have attacked worker rights, voting rights and immigrant rights has done is to bring us together,” Torres said.

###

Contact: Donna De La Cruz at (202) 339-9300     



Tuesday, April 17, 2012

End Racial Profiling, Make Us All Safer

This press release comes from our allies at the National Immigration Forum. The National Immigration Forum is the leading immigrant advocacy organization in the country with a mission to advocate for the value of immigrants and immigration to the nation.

For Immediate Release
April 17, 2012

End Racial Profiling, Make Us All Safer

Washington, D.C. — This morning the Senate’s Constitution and Civil Rights Subcommittee is convening to discuss “Ending Racial Profiling in America.” This is the first Senate hearing in more than ten years to focus on racial profiling, even though federal and state laws passed during that time have required profiling based on race and ethnicity in order to be implemented. The following is a statement by Ali Noorani, Executive Director of the National Immigration Forum.

“From every part of the country, evidence has emerged that the very real practice of racial profiling makes us less safe. It distracts law enforcement time and resources away from the efficient, targeted pursuit of individuals who actually pose a threat to public safety, and it undermines community trust.

“When victims and witnesses of crimes are afraid to come forward for fear of being profiled, the safety of all of us is threatened. In addition, laws that codify racial profiling, including but not limited to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 immigration law, divert valuable resources away from solving serious crimes. Any law that encourages discrimination is just plain wrong.

“Racial profiling also betrays fundamental American values of equality. Treating people of color with more suspicion, whether their families have been in this country for one generation or ten, undermines not only the constitutional rights of targeted groups, but also our core principles on which these rights are based.

“We welcome the opportunity Congress is taking to discuss the unfair, ineffective and harmful practice of racially motivated enforcement. We urge Congress to pass the “End Racial Profiling Act” (ERPA), which would ban racial profiling at the federal, state and local level. We also urge the Obama administration to reform the 2003 Department of Justice Guidance to explicitly reject profiling based on national security or religion and to close loopholes regarding border and national security. These concrete steps would bring our nation closer to banning the ineffective and unjust practice of racial profiling.”

###

Friday, December 16, 2011

DOJ Report Finds Arpaio Engaged in Practice of Civil Rights Abuses, Racial Profiling

December 15, 2011


This release comes from the American Immigration Council.  The American Immigration Council's mission is to strengthen America by honoring our immigrant history and shaping how Americans think about and act towards immigration now and in the future.

DOJ Report Slams Sheriff Joe Arpaio and DHS Restricts 287(g) and Secure Communities Programs
Washington D.C. - After a three-year investigation into the abusive practices of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Maricopa County Sherriff’s Office (MCSO), the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced today that it had found a pattern and practice of civil rights abuses, including extreme cases of racial profiling. The enormity of the violations, the majority of which were experienced by immigrants and Latinos, has led the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to suspend its cooperation agreement (under section 287(g)) with the sheriff’s office and restrict the MCSO’s access to immigration databases through the Secure Communities program.
The dual announcements from DOJ and DHS reinforce what many in Arizona and the broader immigration community have long argued: the practice of allowing local law enforcement to enforce federal immigration law increases the likelihood of racial profiling and pretextual arrests which leads to disastrous results for entire communities.
The DOJ’s Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Thomas E. Perez commented on the investigation noting “MCSO’s systematic disregard for basic constitutional protections has created a wall of distrust between the sheriff’s office and large segments of the community, which dramatically compromises the ability to protect and serve the people. The problems are deeply rooted in MCSO’s culture, and are compounded by MCSO’s penchant for retaliation against individuals who speak out.”

The DOJ has requested a response from Maricopa County and writes “If MCSO is not interested or if we deem that MCSO is not engaged in good-faith efforts to achieve compliance by voluntary means, we are prepared to file a civil action to compel compliance.”

The report contains a review of the constitutional abuses rampant in Maricopa County including an analysis by a leading expert on measuring racial profiling who examined MCSO traffic stops and found that “Latino drivers were between four to nine times more likely to be stopped than similarly situated non-Latino drivers. Overall, the expert concluded that this case involves the most egregious racial profiling in the United States that he has ever personally seen in the course of his work, observed in litigation, or reviewed in professional literature.”

Today’s announcements also highlight the critical issues at stake in the upcoming Supreme Court review of Arizona’s SB 1070, a law that institutionalized the role of state law enforcement in federal immigration matters. Even under the best of circumstances, ceding immigration authority to state officers presents an array of complex and politically charged issues. Under the worst of circumstances, as illustrated by Sherriff Arpaio’s MCSO, state and local law enforcement agencies enforcing federal immigration laws can be disasterous.

###

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Anti-tax Group’s Straw Poll on SB1070 would crumble under the facts

In a post over at the right-wing Oregon Catalyst blog,  the 'Taxpayer Association of Oregon' said that in a “straw poll” of 335 of their supporters, 318 support passage of SB1070, Arizona's controversial racial profiling law, in Oregon.

Even given the informal results of a straw poll, it is curious how members of a group that claims to support fiscal responsibility and opposes the growth of government would support a law that could potentially cost Oregonians hundreds of millions of dollars.

Last week, the Associated Press reported that a bill modeled on Arizona's SB1070 in Utah would cost state and local governments millions of dollars each year. According to the article, Utah cities and counties would need to spend between $5.3 million and $11 million per year to verify the identity of people and detain undocumented immigrants.

It is anyone’s guess how much such a law would cost to implement in Oregon. It certainly could be concluded that the price tag would be comparative and have a detrimental impact on Oregon’s economy and serious consequences on public safety.

Many states once contemplating going the route of Arizona, are now rethinking their positions. The Washington Post reported that that since it’s passage, SB1070 has cost Arizona $250 million in tax revenue, wages and visitor expenditures. Not to mention the legal costs to defend it has mounted into the millions with every judicial decision going against the law.

A Southern Poverty Law Center report released last month also found that because of the mounting legal costs over such legislation, one community had to raise property taxes, while another was forced to cut personnel and outsource its library. In a down economy, this was the last thing that those communities need and it is sure that most Oregonians would agree that it is the last thing our state needs.

The fact is, Oregon does not need the hefty price tag of a law modeled on Arizona’s SB1070. And with Oregonians craving common sense and workable solutions to our state’s problems, Oregon legislators like Representative Kim Thatcher (R-Keizer) should have plenty to do instead of introducing bills that would create a divisive political climate, promote racial profiling, place undue economic burdens on our small businesses and cause a threat to public safety.

For more about the harmful effects that Arizona’s Racial Profiling Law SB1070 could have on Oregon, link here: http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/legal-challenges-and-economic-realities-arizonas-sb-1070  and here: http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/special-reports/qa-guide-state-immigration-laws

Sunday, October 10, 2010

Children Rally for Civil Rights and Immigration Reform at State Capitol

On Saturday, 268 people gathered at the Oregon State Capitol to participate in a Children's March & Rally for Immigration Reform. The children with their adult supporters joined together to call on Federal and State Legislators to:

• Respect the 14th Amendment. Do not take away our children's citizenship.
• Stop dividing families
• Keep racial profiling laws like SB1070 out of Oregon
• Stop local law enforcement from doing the job of ICE. Our State Police, County Sheriff and City Police belong to our communities, not the federal government.
• Pass Comprehensive Immigration Reform NOW!

Here is a selection of photos from the event:
Over the last several months, immigration restrictionists and right-wing extremist politicians in Congress have been calling for a change in the 14th Amendment eliminating citizenship to babies born on United States soil. Instead of promoting immigration reform that would overhaul a severely flawed and broken system, they see it politically opportune to deny citizenship and promote deportation of infants and children.

This is just one of the latest stunts being promoted by extremists to avoid dealing with an important national issue that needs a federal response. Much like passage of Arizona's Racial Profiling Law SB1070, the build-up of troops on the U.S.-Mexico border and the variety of failed enforcement-only policies promoted by the far-right, these wrong headed and misguided schemes are just dividing families and delaying the benefit real reform would bring to our country.

There is currently legislation in both houses of Congress that would overhaul the nation’s broken immigration system.

News Coverage:
Video: Children march for citizenship rights

Monday, August 9, 2010

POSTER: Keep Arizona's Racial Profiling Law out of Oregon

What happens in Arizona stops in Arizona! Help keep Arizona's racial profiling, SB1070, out of Oregon.


Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Would You Ask This Man For His Papers?

From the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU):
Would you ask this man for his papers? Why? Because of the color of his skin? Because of the language he's speaking? Because he's doing yard work?

The fact is, there is no way to tell who is documented and who is not. If SB 1070 is allowed to go into effect, American citizens WILL be subjected to racial profiling. People in this country legally will be stopped, interrogated and harassed simply because of what they look like or the language they are speaking.

That's not right and it's not constitutional. Help us protect the constitution. Help us stop SB 1070. What Happens in Arizona, Stops in Arizona.





Wednesday, July 21, 2010

PHOTOS: Isaiah 58 Solidarity Vigil Against Racial Profiling in Portland

Portland, Ore.--Today at noon, members of the Portland Faith and Immigrant Communities held a prayer vigil and fast in downtown Portland in response to Arizona's Racial Profiling Law, SB1070. Faith leaders prayed and called for an end to the targeting and separation of immigrant families and for passage of comprehensive immigration reform.
Isaiah 58, which inspires this day of action, teaches that a “true fast” is undertaken in service of “loosening the chains of injustice.”

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Baseball Fans Call on Major League Baseball to Move All-Star Game Out of Arizona

For Immediate Release
Thursday, July 8th, 2010

Contact: Martine Apodaca (202) 383-5989

Baseball Fans Call on Major League Baseball to Move All-Star Game Out of Arizona at Joint Protests in DC and New York

Two Days after the Department of Justice Announced Lawsuit against Arizona; Activists Intensify the Pressure on MLB

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Today, Baseball fans and activists opposed to Arizona's harsh and discriminatory anti-immigrant law gathered outside Major League Baseball's lobbyist headquarters to protest the law and called on Major League Baseball to move the 2011 All-Star game out of Phoenix. The activists gathered outside the offices of Baker Hostetler, whose relationship with Major League Baseball "dates back almost as far as the game itself."

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

U.S. Justice Department Files Lawsuit against Arizona over Racial Profiling Law

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 6, 2010

Contact:
Francisco Lopez, Executive Director: (503) 269-5694
Erik Sorensen, Communications Director: (503) 488-0263

U.S. Justice Department Files Lawsuit against Arizona over Racial Profiling Law

Salem, Ore.--Today the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in federal court against the state of Arizona over their racial profiling law, S.B. 1070. The lawsuit argues that Federal authority to enforce immigration law trumps state statute. The Department of Justice has asked for a preliminary injunction to delay the law from going into affect-- citing that it will cause "irreparable harm".

The following is a statement from Francisco Lopez, Executive Director of CAUSA, Oregon's Statewide Immigrant Rights Coalition:

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Events in Salem and Portland to stand against Arizona's Racial Profiling Law

Salem, Ore.-- This Saturday, CAUSA, several other organizations and immigrant rights advocates will hold a rally and march at the Oregon State Capitol in solidarity with the National Day of Action against S.B. 1070--Arizona's New Racial Profiling Law. They will send a message to members of the State Legislature that racist laws like S.B. 1070 are not welcome in Oregon.

After attending the March amd Rally at 11am in Salem, CAUSA and others will head up to Portland to participate in a March and Vigil at 5pm at SW 3rd and Madison.  The Portland March and Vigil is being hosted by the Portland Immigrants Rights Coalition and the Portland May Day Coalition.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Organizations Challenge Arizona Racial Profiling Law in Court

This release comes from our allies at the National Immigration Law Center (NILC) NILC is dedicated to protecting and promoting the rights of low income immigrants and their family members.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Thursday, April 29, 2010

National Immigration Law Center, MALDEF, ACLU, ACLU of Arizona Will Challenge Arizona Racial Profiling Law in Court

PHOENIX -- Today, the National Immigration Law Center, MALDEF, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the ACLU of Arizona held a news conference on the House of Representatives lawn of the Arizona State Capitol Building in Phoenix, Arizona, to announce their future legal challenge to Governor Jan Brewer's recently signed SB1070. In addition, the organizations sought to address misinformation and fears that have been spreading throughout the Latino community across Arizona. MALDEF, ACLU, ACLU of Arizona and NILC leaders were joined by civil rights leaders Dolores Huerta, Richard Chavez and multi-Grammy winning artist and human rights advocate, Linda Ronstadt.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

No to Arizona -- Yes to Immigration Reform


Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Groups Urge Oregonians, Others to Bypass AZ

Chris Thomas, Public News Service - OR
April 27, 2010

PORTLAND, Ore. - This could be the year to visit Hells Canyon instead of the Grand Canyon, depending on one's political point of view. Some advocates of immigration reform are asking people to leave Arizona out of their summer vacation plans, to protest its tough new state law on immigration.

Here in Oregon and around the country, the immigrant community is concerned about the law, which allows police to detain people suspected of being illegal immigrants, and requires immigrants to carry documentation of their status.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Oregon Coalition Condemns Discriminatory New Law Passed in Arizona State

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 23, 2010

Contact:
Francisco Lopez, Executive Director: (503) 269-5694
Erik Sorensen, Communications Director: (503) 488-0263

Oregon Coalition Condemns Discriminatory New Law Passed in Arizona State

Salem, Ore--Oregon's Immigrant Rights Coalition condemns the decision of Arizona Governor Jan Brewer to sign the most extreme legislation anywhere in the country to deal with the nation's broken immigration system.

Signed into law this afternoon, SB1070 provides sweeping and unprecedented immigration enforcement powers to local law enforcement; it legalizes racial profiling and civil rights violations and is a deeply troubling development, the impact spreading far beyond Arizona's state lines. The legislation will prevent local law enforcement from doing their jobs effectively, and will be prohibitively expensive to implement due to serious constitutional and legal questions.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Racial Profiling problem at Portland Police Bureau

According to an article from The Oregonian today, Portland Police Bureau Chief Rosie Sizer addressed the problem her department has with racial profiling.

A 36 page report released by the Bureau shows that in 2007 Portland Police Officers searched people of color more often than whites during traffic stops.

A point of interest. According to Bureau data, minority drivers who were searched were found to possess contraband at lower rates compared to whites who were searched during stops.

To remedy the problems within her Bureau, Sizer pledges to diversify the force, improve officer training and relations within the community.

The full story from The Oregonian can be found here

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Arpaio's Immigration Sweeps Draw Community Criticism and a Lawsuit

According to the news reports, a lawsuit has been brought against Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio for what is said to be racial profiling.

Allegations are that the immigration sweeps conducted by Maricopa County Deputies under the direction of Sheriff Arpaio are targeting vehicles driven by individuals appearing of Hispanic decent to ascertain their citizenship status.

Those who filed the lawsuit claim that the Arpaio’s Deputies had no probable cause to stop the vehicles and those that were stopped for immigration checks were solely done so on basis of their skin color.

The Maricopa Sheriff’s office focus on immigration sweeps haven't been quite a favorite of residents and actually has come at a price. Among the complaints from residents is slow response to emergency calls and failure by the department to thoroughly investigate crimes.

According to the Capitol Times, the most affected are "remote rural communities in the sprawling county, where Arpaio stripped deputies from beat patrols to staff his new immigration enforcement team."

We will continue to follow this story and post updates as they come available.

Popular Posts

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Press Release Distribution