Support CAUSA Today!

Showing posts with label anti-immigrant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-immigrant. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2009

Groups Hostile to Immigrants Attempt to pull GOP on their Sinking Ship

According to our allies over at Immigration Impact, during this week’s National Press Club, a panel from two anti-immigrant groups, Team America PAC and American Cause, discussed why they believe the GOP needs an anti-immigrant platform to save the party.

It seems they believe that because the United States is a “majority white nation”, the GOP needs to focus on winning the “white vote”. Needless to say, turn-out to the Press Club event was poor.

Apparently, as a follow-up to the Press Club event, one of the participants, Peter Brimelow will be speaking at a conference in Baltimore titled “Preserving Western Civilization” . He will tackle such issues as “Problems caused by Third-World immigration into Western Countries” and “Racial differences in intelligence, and how to deal with them.”

Brimelow is the founder of VDARE.com named after Viriginia Dare, the first white child born to English parents in the Americas. According to the article, the Southern Poverty Law Center reports that Brimlow published a book that “argues that America is historically white-dominated and should stay that way.” Go figure!

Read the full story over at Immigration Impact.

**UPDATE** An Editorial ran in Sunday's Edition of the New York Times titled "The Nativists Are Restless" discussing the National Press Club event among other aspects to those hostile to immigrants.

Share/Save/Bookmark




Friday, July 4, 2008

Attacks against Immigrants attacks Black America

Eric K. Ward

I'm African-American and my family moved to California almost a hundred years ago after a lynching took place outside their hometown in Kentucky.

I'm also undocumented, or in the current anti-immigrant vernacular, "illegal." I don't have the necessary documents to prove my identity. Therefore, within four years, I won't be able to vote, have access to social services, or receive state identification to travel.

Let's start from the beginning:

In May 2006, I lost my passport and Social Security card at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (I don't have a driver's license because of a visual disability). When I went home to Chicago, I learned that in order to receive a state identification card, I needed to obtain a certified copy of my birth certificate, which allows me to apply for a Social Security Card to replace my passport.

Later in the week I contacted the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder and was told that in order to receive my birth certificate, I needed to present a copy of my passport, or driver's license, to verify I was, in actuality, Eric K. Ward.

Since it was obvious, after twenty minutes of discussion, that I didn't own a driver's license, a passport, or a social security card, they told me to fill out the proper forms in front of a notary public in Chicago. I quickly opened the phone book and had a co-worker drive me to a notary public. But when I got there, the notary public said I needed a passport, social security card, or driver's license to receive an official notary seal.

Lucky for me (when I'm in a pinch) I can become very persuasive. And since I had a number of newspaper articles with photos documenting my identity, the notary public accepted my articles with somewhat dubious satisfaction. Next, before anyone could change their minds, I walked next door to the Post Office and happily mailed my documents to the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder and went on with my life.

Four weeks later my birth certificate arrived!

But when I arrived at the Post Office to pick it up, the attendant asked me to produce a passport, driver's license and, most ironically, a copy of my birth certificate to obtain my birth certificate. After waiting an hour and pleading with two supervisors, I'm proud to say that I now possess a certified birth certificate!

I wish I could say everything went smoothly from this point on, but the adventure only began and came to a screeching halt within a week.

A few days later I headed to the Social Security Administration to obtain a replacement social security card. But when I got there, the Social Security Administration said I needed more than just a copy of my birth certificate. They said I also needed a passport, driver's license, or state identification card to prove my identity.

But since I went to the Social Security Administration to obtain a new copy of my social security card so I could get a new passport, the Social Security Administration didn't know what to do with me. So, they told me to head across town to the Illinois Secretary of State's office to get my social security card. But when I arrived, the Illinois Secretary of State's office said I needed my social security card to obtain any official document to prove my identity.

Now I'm stuck in a Catch-22 and I'm not alone in this predicament. Almost nine percent of African Americans (18 or older) are unable to document their citizenship. * Roughly 2 million African Americans, eleven million native born citizens, and nearly twice as many low income Americans than citizens with higher incomes don't have a social security card, driver's licenses, passport, birth certificate or proof of naturalization. *

In 1950, Sam Shapiro, now Emeritus Professor of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, conducted a case study for the journal Population Studies, and also found that, due to segregation barring black children from being born in white hospitals, one-fifth of African Americans born between 1939-40 were never issued birth certificates.

When you correlate Shapiro's figures to the 2000 US Census Data on African American Population by Age, Shapiro's figures show that by 2010, nearly half-a-million elderly African Americans born before 1941 may loose their right to vote and access to federal services. Remember, this is only for African Americans born before 1941!

Most recently, Tim Vercelloti, a professor at Rutgers University, found that 5.7% of African Americans are less likely to vote in states that require voter identification. And let's not forget, voting is a right African Americans struggled to secure for all American citizens.

If U. S citizens don't have the "required" documents to prove their identity, an increasingly large portion of U.S. citizens will be denied access to social services and the right to vote at the federal, state, and local level.

For example, in 2006, officials in Maricopa County, Arizona denied almost 5,000 US citizens the right to vote because they didn't have the "required" documents. In 2005, The Draft Reduction Act denied anyone re-applying for Medicaid who didn't posses the same "required" documents. And by 2010, the Federal Election Integrity Act (passed in 2006) will deny all American citizens the right to vote if they're can't produce the "required" documents.

What are the "required" documents? You guessed it: a passport, birth certificate or proof of naturalization.

Why is this happening?

Strict ID requirements that target immigrant and refugee communities also target African Americans, poor, and elderly communities. Federal, state, and local laws that attack undocumented immigrants and refugees threaten Americans' voting rights, the right to travel without fear of imprisonment, and access to social services.

Anti-immigrant activists say strict ID requirements are a necessary burden that folks should be happy to shoulder in the fight against "illegal" immigration. But that's pretty easy to say when you're not African American, poor, or a member of the elderly community.

As African Americans we should be deeply concerned about the ongoing attack on immigrants and refugees. Why?

We know what it's like to be second-class citizens---and it's about to happen again.

Eric Ward is the Executive Director of the Northwest Coalition for Human Dignity. The Northwest Coalition for Human Dignity works to expand and enhance civil and human rights and also to end malicious harassment and hate violence.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Lou Dobbs making a run for Governor?

As our partners at FIRM reported on Friday, apparently anti-immigration CNN commentator Lou Dobbs has been contemplating a run for Governor of New Jersey next year. To help Mr. Dobbs out, a website has been launched on his behalf announcing his platform.

His Platform:

  • Build a fence around New Jersey
  • Build like the biggest fence ever built around New Jersey
  • Deport everyone who looks like they might be an illegal immigrant
  • Ban the flying of the Irish flag on St. Patrick’s Day
  • Deport the Statue of Liberty back to France
  • Replace the New Jersey State Police with Minutemen

  • Although the platform seems realistic for Mr. Dobbs, if readers take a closer look, they will notice that the website is not real. According to Frank Sharry, Executive Director of America’s Voice, “Lou Dobbs is not a real candidate, he’s a caricature of what is wrong with the current immigration debate. He offers no real solutions to our broken immigration system, and simply uses his program to spread proven lies, stir up racial tensions and fear, and provide a platform to known hate groups.”

    The new Dobbs Campaign website is hosting a contest as well offering the winner who submits the best campaign slogan a free t-shirt with their slogan on it.

    For more information, visit http://www.dobbsforgovernor.com/.

    Friday, May 30, 2008

    Anti-immigrant Play of the Week: Lou Dobbs Confuses Himself on E-Verify

    This week’s Anti-immigrant Play of the Week goes to conservative pundit Lou Dobbs host of a nightly news show on CNN, for contradicting himself on the voluntary employment verification system, commonly known as Basic Pilot or E-Verify.

    According to Truth in Immigration, despite mounting evidence showing the system containing major flaws, and despite contrary assessments from his own show and other news programs on CNN, Dobbs claimed that “E-verify works”. Interestingly enough, Dobbs opposed E-Verify when it was part of the comprehensive immigration compromise, but seems to now endorse it when it is part of a deportation-only bill.




    Lou Dobbs was recently featured in a report by Media Matters and articles from the Wall Street Journal and New York Times for his promotion of fear, anger and resentment towards immigrants. It seems to the anti-immigrant crowd facts mean very little, so long as their political agenda is met.

    Wednesday, February 6, 2008

    Message Against Immigrants not Resonating with Voters

    This morning, anti-immigrant activists, radio commentators and bloggers everywhere have probably heard the news by now that the message of hate towards Latinos isn’t resonating with Americans. The results from Super Tuesday didn’t show favorably on Mitt Romney or his rhetoric against immigrants.

    Since getting the nod from Rep. Tom Tancredo several months ago, the candidate for the Republican Presidential Nomination has been trying to gain ground with his stance against immigrants. The day after Super Tuesday, it is clearer than ever that voters reject Romney and his message against the very people who keep this country going.

    In this piece from today’s Wall Street Journal titled “Immigration Misfire”, Author Rosa Rosales explains the results from Super Tuesday and it's relationship to the immigration debate.

    Immigration Misfire

    By ROSA ROSALES
    February 5, 2008; Page A16

    Political pundits used to maintain that the American electorate was galvanized around the issue of illegal immigration. Voters, they claimed, would punish any candidate who failed to take a tough stance on immigrants and did not adamantly oppose the "A" word -- Amnesty -- in all its tortured definitions.

    Yet a funny thing happened in Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. The most anti-immigrant candidates performed below expectations, and those accused of supporting amnesty and in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants won. >>read on

    Wednesday, January 23, 2008

    Oregon Employers Form Immigrant Rights Coalition

    in the news

    According to this morning's Eugene Register-Guard, employers from around Oregon have formed an immigrant rights coalition called the Oregon Essential Worker Immigration Coalition. The purpose of the coalition to to give employers a collective in a debate that has anti-immigrant opponents on one side, and Hispanic and immigrant-rights activists on the other. The coalition will launch its research, public-relations and lobbying efforts.

    Oregon employers launch immigrant-rights coalition
    By David Steves The Register-Guard
    January 23, 2008

    SALEM — Restaurants, nurseries and other Oregon employers are jumping into the state’s roiling immigration debate, bringing pro-business credentials to the fight against proposals seen as hostile to foreign-born workers and their families.

    The Oregon Essential Worker Immigration Coalition is planning a February launch of its research, public-relations and lobbying efforts — all meant to add the voices of employers to a debate that’s largely pitted illegal-immigration opponents on one side, and Hispanic and immigrant-rights activists on the other. >>read entire article

    Wednesday, December 12, 2007

    FAIR Exposed as a Bona Fide Hate Group

    Yesterday, the Southern Poverty Law Center released a report exposing the anti-immigrant organization, Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), as a "bona fide hate group".

    In their report, The Teflon Nativists: FAIR Marked by ties of White Supremacy, SPLC cites FAIR's long time anti-Latino and anti-Catholic attitudes and history of questionable statements and associations.

    Among the findings of the report, SPLC showed that the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR):

  • is the creation of a man who operates a racist publishing company and has compared immigrants to "bacteria;"


  • has employed members of white supremacist groups in key positions;


  • has promoted racist conspiracy theories; and


  • has accepted more than $1 million from the Pioneer Fund, a racist foundation devoted to eugenics and to proving a connection between race and IQ.

    Read their complete report Here

  • Popular Posts

     
    Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Press Release Distribution